The 2/28/2021 post from Heather Cox Richardson’s Letters From An American:
On Sunday, February 28, 2021, 09:49:35 PM MST, Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American <email@example.com> wrote:
|February 28, 2021Heather Cox RichardsonMar 1|
In the wee hours of Saturday morning, the House of Representatives passed the American Rescue Plan, the $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief bill requested by the Biden administration. The vote was 219 to 212, with two Democrats—Jared Golden (D-ME) and Kurt Schrader (D-OR)—voting no. Not a single Republican voted for the bill.
The coronavirus relief bill illustrates a crisis in our democracy.This measure is enormously popular. On Thursday, the day before the House took up the bill, a poll by Morning Consult/Politico showed that 76% of Americans liked the measure, including 60% of Republicans. It includes $1400 stimulus checks which, together with the $600 checks in the previous package, get us to the $2000 checks that former president Trump, a Republican, demanded.It includes increased unemployment benefits of $400 weekly, provides $350 billion in aid to state and local governments, establishes tax credits for children, provides money to reopen schools, funds $8.5 billion to distribute vaccines, and gives small business relief.
The bill is popular among Republican mayors and governors, whose governments cannot borrow to make up for tax revenue lost because of the pandemic and who are facing deficits of $80 to $100 billion even with money from the last relief packages. The deficits will require devastating cuts on top of the 1.3 million jobs that have already been cut in the past year. Relief is “not a Republican issue or a Democrat issue,” Fresno, California, mayor Jerry Dyer told Griff Witte of the Washington Post earlier this month. “It’s a public health issue. It’s an economic issue. And it’s a public safety issue.”
Those in favor of the measure note that while there is still close to $1 trillion unspent from previous coronavirus relief bills, currently unspent money has been assigned already: it is distributed among programs that are designed to spend it over a period of time. This includes federal employment benefits, which are distributed weekly; the Paycheck Protection Program, which is held in reserve for employers to apply for funds from it; enhanced medical matching funds to be distributed as the pandemic requires; and tax breaks to be spent as people file their tax returns.
The chair of the Federal Reserve, which oversees our banking system, Jerome H. Powell, has backed the idea of increased federal spending; so has Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. Powell was nominated to his current position by Trump (he was nominated to the Federal Reserve Board by President Barack Obama); Yellen is a Biden appointee.This is a bill that should have gotten some Republican votes in the House of Representatives.
But it didn’t. Republican lawmakers are complaining about the partisan vote and scoffing that President Biden promised to unify the country. But the problem is not the bill. The problem is the Republican lawmakers, who are determined to oppose anything the Democrats propose.
The American Rescue Plan bill now goes to the Senate, where Republican senators appear to be united against it. In a statement, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) complained about the Democrats’ “deliberately partisan process” in writing the bill, but the Republicans willing to meet with President Biden—McConnell was not one of them– proposed a measure that provided less than one-third the relief in the present bill. There is enormous urgency to passing the bill quickly, since current federal unemployment benefits expire on March 14.
The Senate is evenly split between the Democrats and the Republicans, with each party holding 50 seats (technically, Senators Angus King of Maine and Bernie Sanders of Vermont are Independents, but they currently work with the Democrats). Although each party effectively holds 50 seats, the Democrats represent 41.5 million more Americans than the Republicans do, in nation that has 328.2 million people.In addition to their disproportionate power in the Senate, the Republicans can stop legislation through the filibuster. This is a holdover from an earlier era, in which a senator could stop a bill approved by a majority by refusing to stop talking about it, which would prevent the bill from coming to a vote unless senators voted to invoke “cloture,” a process that limits consideration of a pending bill to 30 additional hours. Today, cloture requires 60 votes.
The filibuster was rarely used before about 1960; in the early twentieth century, southern senators used it primarily to stop civil rights legislation. But as the volume of business in the Senate raised the need to streamline debate, the Senate reformed the filibuster so that a senator could simply threaten a filibuster to kill a bill. Our current Republican lawmakers use these “holds” to kill any measure that cannot muster 60 votes, effectively turning the Senate into a body that requires not a majority to pass legislation, but rather a supermajority. Those who defend the filibuster argue that this supermajority requirement will make senators create bills that are bipartisan, but in fact it has meant that a small minority controls the Senate.
So Democrats will have to pass the American Rescue Plan through a procedure known as “reconciliation,” which enables certain budget bills to pass with a simple majority rather than the 60 votes currently necessary for a regular bill. But the Senate can only pass three bills a year through this process, and there are strict limits to what can be in them. The Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan judge of the procedural rules of the Senate, has decided that the $15-an-hour federal minimum wage in the current bill does not meet the requirements of reconciliation. Fifty-nine percent of Americans like the idea of raising the minimum wage to $15 by 2025, as the bill sets out, but the hike cannot be included in the convoluted process necessary to get the bill through without the supermajority the current filibuster system requires.
Senate leadership can overrule or fire the parliamentarian, but that really doesn’t matter in this case because at least one Democrat, Senate Joe Manchin (D-WV), opposes the increased minimum wage. His opposition would sink the entire measure because the Democrats need every one of their 50 votes.
The American Rescue Plan will likely pass—without the increased minimum wage—but it will do so only because the Democrats won both Georgia Senate seats in January, giving them an equal number of senators to the Republicans.
The Democrats will be able to pass a bill popular with more than 3 out of 4 of us only because they have a slight majority in the House and can use a special budget measure to work around the Republican senators who represent 41.5 million fewer Americans than the Democrats do.The coronavirus relief bill illustrates just how dangerously close we are to minority rule.—-Notes:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/12/22/trump-stimulus-video-bill/list of bill characteristics:Matt McDermott @mattmfmEvery House Republican voted against: — $1,400 stimulus checks — Increased unemployment benefits — State & local government aid — $3,000+ child tax credits — Funds to reopen schools — Funds for vaccine distribution — Funds for rental assistance — Small business reliefFebruary 27th 202114,419 Retweets35,692 Likeshttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/13/us-state-local-governments-covid-pandemic-economic-impactshttps://www.washingtonpost.com/national/local-republicans-support-biden-covid-relief-plan/2021/02/14/9791d4ba-6d65-11eb-9ed1-73d434b5147f_story.htmlhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/02/28/fed-biden-inflation-19-trillion-stimulus/https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/11/covid-stimulus-updates-nancy-pelosi-says-relief-bill-will-pass-by-march.htmlhttps://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/27/gop-coronavirus-stimulus-471815https://www.vox.com/2020/10/26/21534358/supreme-court-amy-coney-barrett-constitution-anti-democratic-electoral-college-senatehttps://www.vox.com/2020/11/6/21550979/senate-malapportionment-20-million-democrats-republicans-supreme-courthttps://www.npr.org/2021/02/26/971793277/who-the-senate-parliamentarian-who-ruled-against-a-minimum-wage-increasehttps://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-politics-of-the-tug-of-war-over-the-minimum-wageShareThanks for subscribing to Letters from an American. This post is public, so feel free to share it.Share
This well-research post tells most of the story of our “democracy” if read carefully. “America” is no longer divided. The division is in the unequal representation of our current political system and, while the Republicans are talking about Democratic party solidarity, it is their own party politics against the wishes of the majority of their own voters and representing, instead, their wealthy and generous financial backers that is the real problem right now.
And, lest it be lost to our collective consciousness, BOTH parties in the Senate voted 100% to foolishly, illegally and immorally invade Iraq in 2003 with only one lone, independent Senator opposing it. And BOTH parties support a massive “defense” budget that equals the next 10 countries COMBINED while our own country was last attacked by a foreign country for one day 80 years ago! We have 200,000 armed and very dangerous people occupying other nations and interfering in their laws and economies, yet we cannot support our own beleaguered economy when it is in need.
What our nation has been fighting for isn’t “freedom” or “democracy.” What our Senate represents isn’t the people of their states. These Senators are selected by wealthy people who spend billions each election cycle to buy massive advertising and control party politics by holding its purse strings.
Dick Cheney was the CEO of Haliburton Corporation, a company that lives or dies by getting lucrative but dangerous contracts from our federal government in combat zones. His boss was a Texas oilman that had friendly financial ties to wealthy oilmen in Saudi Arabia. And Saudi Arabia is run by a wealthy but despotic royal family that was put in power by the Allies after WWI and kept there by our tax dollars and second-tier weaponry. Kuwait was a British colony carved off the southern border of Iraq at the end of World War I at the site of massive oil reserves and a deep water port on the Persian Gulf suitable for exporting Saudi Arabia’s crude oil to the Allies. At the time of Saddam Hussein’s invasion, Kuwait was a British/American colony with over 200 oil wells on its border with Iraq which had been slant-drilled under that border stealing Iraq’s oil and selling it on the cheap to its creators/defenders.
ARAMCO, at one time the wealthiest single corporation in the world, was jointly owned by members of the Saudi royal family and American oil barons, those people who were best friends with both Bush 41 and Bush 43, all getting rich off of the natural resources of the Middle East and their joint wealth and power in the world.
Need I go over the lies told to the world and to and about Saddam Hussein? I’m not saying Hussein was a saint, but I will say his successors and the lawlessness they and their American allies created were FAR worse.
The point I’m making is that elections are influenced and laws are written by PACs that represent a wealthy and greedy minority against the best interests and well-being of the rest of us. And, when we believe these “influences,” we aren’t really an effective democracy. The other point I’m making is that the money and manpower to make things better is spent on destruction and destructive capability; on making things worse (but more profitable for these wealthy few).